The subjective block holds fewer than ten criteria, or more than 30% of the total weight. Either alone is the error.
Do this instead
Add a criterion for each region nothing grades. Over the cap, add the objective checks your prompts call for, then lower overstated subjective weights.
Where it happened
2 real tasks. Each shows the spot and what it should have been; click any line to open the task there.
the words at faultthe row or field at faultmissing from the taskwhat is righta task file
Example 30Property & Space · 5 Leg A turns
What is wrongThe subjective block carries 32 of 103 absolute weight, 31.1%, over the 30% cap. Its twelve criteria clear the count of ten; the weight alone is the error.
The objective block holds 21 criteria worth 71 absolute weight; the subjective block holds 12 worth 32, with subjective criteria 1 and 2 at +5.
One +5 lowered to +3: 30 of 101, 29.7%, with almost no margin.
How it breaks the standardSigns ignored, so subjective criterion 11's -3 counts as 3: 32 over 103 is 31.1%. Twelve criteria clear the count of ten, so the weight alone breaks the cap, and 1.1 points over is still over. No single row is wrong; only dividing the sums shows it. It costs points.
What is wrongThe subjective block holds five criteria, where the Guidelines expect ten or more, and none grades the cutting diagrams or the scribe plan Leg A turn 1 asks for.
Leg A turn 1 asks for front_room_builtin.html: a cut list in mm, how to scribe the edges that meet the wall and ceiling, and a cutting diagram for each sheet.
Ten or more, region by region, each naming front_room_builtin.html, the cutting diagrams and the scribe plan included.
How it breaks the standardObjective criteria 14 and 25 check the parts in the three cutting diagrams, and objective criterion 13 that the scribe plan names the part at each edge. No subjective criterion looks at how either reads, so an unreadable diagram scores the same as a clear one. It costs points.
Same weight set {-5, -3, -1, +1, +3, +5}; block capped at 30% of total task weight.
Signs are ignored on both sides of the division.
Why it matters
The cap keeps the score dominated by deterministic checks. Over it, presentation judgments start to crowd out whether the task was done. Under the count, the block cannot cover a multi panel deliverable: a nested table, a timeline strip or a set of diagrams goes ungraded, and two runs presenting the same correct figures very differently score the same.
Example 30Too few subjective criteria, or too much weight on themCosts points
Property & Space5 Leg A turnstask 6a9e4478f55775e9124002e4
From the taskThe set, in numbers
21
objective criteria
12
subjective criteria
3 (9.1%)
negative criteria
31.1%
subjective share of weight
4
criteria targeting Trajectory
103
total absolute weight
-5×1-3×2+1×8+3×13+5×9
weights in use, both blocks
From the taskSubjective block, all 12 criteria
1
Running text in the page's evidence and detail sections is set at a size no smaller than the page's own body text, rather than reduced to a secondary small size.
Each scope line's own wording, the county's wording, and the reviewer's reading are visually separated from one another rather than run together in a single block of prose.
Nothing grades how the cutting diagrams or the scribe plan read.
From the taskLeg A prompt, turn 1, to Model A
Leg A turn 1
Hi, I need a plan for the built-in on the front room wall, the one between the corner and the door. Halvard agreed to build it, but he needs a proper cut list as the wall isn't a perfect square. I measured it and took photos at the floor, middle and ceiling levels + made a sketch, and keep in mind that the photos are the ground truth for the measurements if something's off. I have a voice memo of what plywood he has and a sticky note with his shop rules attached so stick to those. It has to fit my drafting table, my bound notebooks(standing up) + my printing plates. I included a picture of my notebooks to see their sizes from and leave space for two more seasons of notebooks(my calendar has info on how many I do per season). I still have to verify something on the photo of the plates, so skip that for now. Write all up as front_room_builtin.html - the cut list in mm with each part sized to the real wall, how to scribe the edges that meet the wall and ceiling and a cutting diagram for each sheet.
From the taskObjective criteria 13, 14, 25
13
The scribing instructions name the part that closes the gap at each of the three edges that meet the structure: the door end, the corner end and the top.
No part in the sheet diagrams overlaps another part, runs off the edge of its sheet, or crosses the knocked corner of roughly 300 by 400 on the damaged sheet.