Red Shell · Common Errors

All mistakes/Section 4: A rubric that separates two runs

4.2A requirement nothing grades, and a criterion nothing asked for

Fails the taskRubric Criteria - Overall Rubric Quality

The mistake

A prompt requirement no criterion checks, or a criterion no turn asked for, usually written from the golden. Both are Major; a non critical gap, or a criterion that only narrows a real ask, costs points.

Do this instead

Write criteria from the prompt, never from the golden. Where an instruction closes a set, write the closure: X consists only of A, B and C.

Where it happened

2 real tasks. Each shows the spot and what it should have been; click any line to open the task there.

the words at faultthe row or field at faultmissing from the taskwhat is righta task file

Example 16Visual Learning · 4 Leg A turns

What is wrongObjective criterion 12 requires runbook_for_cyrus.md to cite the team's cleaning threads. No Leg A turn asks for a citation: Leg A turn 3 asks for a check against them.

Leg A turn 3 asks Model A to check runbook_for_cyrus.md against “what we worked out” in the team's threads, and to put the request and due date on top.

Where it shows

Sources behind these rules: the pipeline sketch, the 09-04 standup voice note…the golden's last line

What it should have been

Criterion 12Delete it
and its copy in milestone 11

How it breaks the standardA correct run checks every rule against the threads and fixes the ones that diverge, as Leg A turn 3 asks, and still fails objective criterion 12 for lacking a citation nobody requested. The golden passes only because runbook_for_cyrus.md happens to end with a Sources line, so checking against the golden never exposes it.

The rule it breaksQC spec appendix · Rubric Quality Definitions · Incorrect Criteria Criterion is not an explicit requirement in the prompt

Example 17Visual Learning · 4 Leg A turns

What is wrongLeg A turn 4 limits Keep to what survives the sheets, Yusuf's email and the calendar. No criterion grades it: objective criteria 21 and 25 exclude only IMG_2201.jpg and IMG_2105.jpg.

notes.md defines Keep on canon_study.html: the live head height, the plate IMG_2104.jpg, and the conference and workshop facts from Yusuf's email and the calendar. IMG_2107.jpg is not among them.

Where it shows

No criterion closes Keep. Only IMG_2201.jpg and IMG_2105.jpg are ruled out, by criteria 21 and 25.

What it should have been

New criterionAdd it
Last-turn canon_study.html Keep holds only the items criteria 1 to 10 check for, and nothing else.

How it breaks the standardModel A walked into the gap: its Leg A turn 4 page keeps IMG_2107.jpg, the deep back muscles plate, under Keep, though notes.md says “Keep is only IMG_2104.jpg.” No negative names IMG_2107.jpg, so no criterion fails Model A for it, and the point of Leg A turn 4 goes ungraded.

The rule it breaksGuidelines · 5.7 Final Rubric Checklist Anything you can tick needs a criterion.

Catch it in your own task

Pair each prompt requirement with its criterion, and each criterion with the sentence that asks for it.

Where the correct guidance is written

Section titles as they print, so you can search for them in the document.

Guidelines · 5.7 Final Rubric Checklist

Walk the prompt once per turn and tick off every ask. Anything you can tick needs a criterion.

QC spec appendix · Rubric Quality Definitions · Incorrect Criteria

Criterion is not an explicit requirement in the prompt and implementing it makes the response worse.
1 more source

QC spec appendix · Rubric Quality Definitions · Missing Criteria - Critical Requirements

Count each missing rubric that ought to check for an explicit requirement in the prompt or a critical implicit expectation of the prompt as one issue

A Major issue.

Why it matters

An ungraded requirement means a run can do the wrong thing and still pass the whole set, which is exactly the failure the rubric existed to catch. A criterion nobody asked for does the reverse: it punishes a run for doing what the user actually said. The first is Major when the requirement is critical. The second is Incorrect Criteria, which is Major, when no turn asks for anything like it, and Overfitting, which is Moderate, when it narrows a real ask, such as an order nobody requested. It also hides: it is usually written from the golden, so the golden passes it.

Every example taken apart, with the task, how it breaks the standard and what it should have been: 4.2 A requirement nothing grades, and a criterion nothing asked for, in the explanations →